982 resolution. Declaration of conformity to GOST R (earlier)

Have a question? Call 8 499 647-75-64 or write info@notifikat.ru

Hello everyone, my name is Vladislav.

And today we will talk with you about Declarations of conformity in the GOST R system, aka the 982 Resolution, a Single List, and so on.

We have a question about the declaration schemes in the GOST R system. What schemes should be chosen in each individual case?

And what adds to the confusion is the fact that if we look at the Single List, at the 982 Resolution, we will see that there are notes to the vast majority of positions. They are indicated by asterisks "*" (*, **, ***) and so on, and some positions do not have them at all.

What are they telling us?

A detailed explanation of these notes (in front of you on the video). In general, it boils down to the fact that everything that falls under these notes refers to accredited certification bodies. This means test reports from accredited laboratories and Certificates of the quality management system from accredited bodies. But how is this applied in practice and under what scheme of declaration does this or that evidence base go?

Now we will try to figure this out with you.

We know that we have a standard GOST R 54008-2010 from 2010 and it just presents standard schemes (1d, 2d, 3d, and so on

up to 7d). And the practice of their application is banal: 1d for serial production on a voluntary evidence base, 2d for party production, 3d serial production from an accredited certification body, and so on. But, considering the fact that we have notes ("*", "**", "***"), we have a misunderstanding about which scheme is more correct to choose in a particular situation.

We are trying to understand what will be right in our particular situation? But we have no room for panic.

We know about the existence of GOST R 56532-2015 from 2015. It is worth noting the fact that this GOST is of a recommendatory nature. That is, it does not cancel the actions of GOST R 54008-2010, but makes explanations on how to more correctly carry out certification in the GOST R system.

What are we interested in this guest?

First, in order for us to move further on our topic, we need to understand such a concept as the circle of applicants.

Conditionally, it can be divided into two categories:

the first is the applicant who is the manufacturer, or the applicant representing the interests of the manufacturer (a person authorized by the manufacturer in the territory of the Russian Federation);

the second is the applicant-seller. It does not perform any functions of the manufacturer, and it simply does not have the rights to do so. It performs "buy-sell" functions based on contracts, invoices, and so on (bought, brought everything).

Moving on.

As for the schemes?

This GOST (GOST R 56532-2015) recommends us to choose from only two schemes, they are called that-the first and second scheme.

What are the differences between them?

Here we return to the notes with asterisks and make a reference to them. And, having already remembered about this, we are sorting out what goes under the first scheme, what goes into the second scheme.

We see that according to the first scheme, only the applicant-manufacturer, that is, performing the functions of the manufacturer on the territory of the Russian Federation (a person authorized by the manufacturer), can accept declarations from us. But he can also go according to the second scheme, since he has many times more powers, since he performs the role of the manufacturer (is a representative of the manufacturer), and his field of action is wider.

How will it be different here?

The first scheme we have says that for all positions to which certain notes (with asterisks) are not applied, the applicant-manufacturer can choose this scheme on the basis of voluntary evidentiary materials (test reports from voluntary laboratories, a certificate of the quality management system from voluntary certification bodies). It is quite possible to imagine a situation that

according to the first scheme, it is possible to adopt a declaration of GOST r and on the basis of a foreign ISO.

The situation changes dramatically with the second scheme. All the products that fall under the notes with asterisks go into it("*", "**", "***"), and here the nuances begin. We see that the applicant-seller cannot accept declarations of conformity under the first scheme.

What does this mean?

And this means that the applicant-seller accepts the GOST R declaration on the basis of the contract and is obliged to provide as

evidence base test reports or certificates of the quality management system only from accredited bodies and laboratories in accordance with the established procedure according to the legislation.

Moving on.

In theory, everything is "rosy and beautiful" there are specific recommendations on how to do everything correctly and conveniently, but what in practice?

We are going to the FSA registration website (Rosaccreditation website) and we want to register the declaration in the GOST R system. We choose any category of goods that fall under the notes (we do this specifically), and we want to choose a declaration scheme. In the scheme selection field

there is a whole list of declarations according to GOST standards (certification, declaration, GOST R, and so on). We are looking specifically for our GOST, it is available, but even if we choose it and move further on the registration of the declaration, we will find the fact that we cannot physically do this. Because such a function has not yet been implemented on the Rosaccreditation website.

If we were a little more attentive, we would have noticed at the very beginning (when choosing declaration schemes) that there is a note opposite the field with the declaration scheme selection in which it will be written that when choosing declaration schemes, we choose them in accordance with GOST 54008-2010, that is, what we left for and came to.

In fact, nothing has changed.

As we used standard schemes, so we use them. It is not clear until what time this will happen, and whether there will be any changes

it's also not entirely clear. Since the more recent GOST R 56532-2015 is of a recommendatory nature and only time will tell what will change in practice.

That's all for me.

You will be charged with likes and a subscription.

Have a nice day, bye.